Stacking Self-Funded Plans with HRAs: A Practical Strategy


BY: Rodger A. Bayne
President, Benefit Indemnity Corporation
Phone: 443-275-7412
Email: rodger.bayne@benefitindemnity.co

Health plan design continues to evolve as employers look for ways to balance affordability, flexibility, and meaningful employee benefits. One approach that has remained relevant—and is now often paired with more advanced funding strategies—is the Health Reimbursement Arrangement (HRA). More recently, discussions around "stacked" or layered self-funded designs have expanded how HRAs are used in modern plan structures.

This overview breaks down what HRAs are, how they function, and how they may fit into broader self-funded plan strategies.


What is an HRA?
A Health Reimbursement Arrangement (HRA) is an employer-funded benefit that reimburses employees for eligible medical expenses.

First formally defined by the IRS in 2002, HRAs are considered tax-advantaged arrangements where:
  • Employers set aside funds to reimburse qualified medical expenses
  • Employees are not taxed on eligible reimbursements
  • Employers generally receive tax deductions for qualified reimbursements
  • Unused funds may, depending on plan design, roll over for future use
Importantly, HRAs are fully employer-funded. Employees do not contribute to the reimbursement account.
HRAs are governed by IRS rules, including nondiscrimination requirements and other plan compliance standards designed to ensure fair access across employee groups.


How HRAs Are Commonly Used
In many cases, HRAs are paired with high-deductible health plans (HDHPs).

This structure typically works like this:
  1. Employers select a lower-premium medical plan with a higher deductible
  2. The premium savings are partially redirected into an HRA fund
  3. Employees use HRA dollars to help offset deductible or out-of-pocket costs
This approach can shift how healthcare dollars are allocated without necessarily reducing the richness of coverage.


Why employers use this structure

HRAs are often used to:
  • Offset the cost of higher deductibles for employees
  • Reduce overall premium spending
  • Increase predictability in healthcare budgeting
  • Maintain competitive employee benefits while controlling costs

When designed effectively, employers may be able to offer comparable benefits to traditional plans at a lower overall cost structure.


Behavioral and Financial Impact

One additional aspect of HRAs is their influence on how employees engage with healthcare spending.

Because reimbursement funds are defined and visible, employees may:
  • Become more cost-aware in their healthcare decisions
  • Seek to manage spending within available benefit dollars
  • Better understand the value of plan utilization
From an employer perspective, this increased visibility can sometimes contribute to more efficient utilization patterns over time.


What Does "Stacking" Mean in Self-Funded Plan Design?
More recently, HRAs and self-funded plans are being discussed in the context of "stacked" plan designs.  In simple terms, stacking refers to layering multiple funding or savings mechanisms within a single benefits strategy.

A typical concept of a stacked approach might include:
  • A self-funded medical plan (base layer of claims funding)
  • An HRA or reimbursement layer (secondary support for employee costs)
  • Additional plan design features that help manage risk or stabilize costs
The goal is not complexity for its own sake, but rather creating multiple "levers" within a plan that can help manage different parts of healthcare spending.


What Are "Double-Stacked" Savings?

The idea of "double-stacked" savings comes from combining two distinct cost-saving mechanisms:
  1. Primary savings from plan structure
    • For example, shifting from fully insured to self-funded arrangements
    • Or selecting plan designs that reduce fixed premium costs
  2. Secondary savings through reimbursement or funding strategy
    • Such as an HRA helping offset employee out-of-pocket exposure
    • Or unused funds remaining within employer-controlled design parameters
When structured carefully, these layers can work together—one reducing baseline costs, the other optimizing how remaining healthcare dollars are allocated.


Key Considerations for Employers and Brokers

While stacked and HRA-based strategies can offer flexibility, they also require thoughtful design. Important considerations include:
  • Employee communication and understanding of benefit structure
  • Compliance with IRS and healthcare regulations
  • Appropriate alignment between deductible levels and reimbursement funding
  • Long-term sustainability of funding assumptions
  • Integration with stop-loss or other risk protection tools in self-funded environments
Not every employer will benefit from a layered approach, but understanding how these components interact is increasingly important in modern benefits planning.


Final Thoughts
HRAs remain a foundational tool in employer-sponsored benefits design, particularly when paired with high-deductible or self-funded arrangements. As plan strategies become more sophisticated, layering—or "stacking"—different funding mechanisms has emerged as a way to balance cost control with employee support.

For brokers and employers alike, the key takeaway is not necessarily to adopt any one structure, but to understand how different plan components can interact to create more efficient and sustainable benefit designs.





Rodger A. Bayne
President, Benefit Indemnity Corporation
Phone:
443-275-7412
Email: rodger.bayne@benefitindemnity.co

 

Read More:

Self-Funding or Health Insurance: What's The Difference?

Thinking about self-funding vs. traditional health insurance? The key difference comes down to one thing: *who takes on the risk.* With self-funding, employers take control—paying claims directly while using stop-loss protection to limit risk. The result? Greater flexibility, more transparency, and real opportunities to reduce costs. As more employers explore this option, education and the right fit are everything.

How Reference-Based Pricing Is Outperforming PPOs: Real Results from Benefit Indemnity

Benefit Indemnity’s use of Reference‑Based Pricing (RBP) delivers significantly greater savings than traditional PPO plans. In recent client case studies, several companies realized savings ranging from ~64% to ~85% compared to typical Medicare-based benchmarks — with most claims processed cleanly and minimal balance-bill issues. The results make a strong case that RBP can outperform PPO networks while still maintaining stability and predictability for employers.

Trendy or On-Point?

Language can be quite interesting. The dictionary teaches us the definition of words at a young age, but society “teaches” us the meaning of words in today’s social media following world. You may or may not love to be trendy, but can being trendy get you in trouble?

$1,060,000*: Revolution Health Plans Returns Over a Million Dollars in Claims Funds

The first thing to know about renewals is that it’s always better to share renewal news—whether it’s good or bad—in person. This is the perfect opportunity to go over the reports and explain how their funds have been used. The aggregate report will show 9 months of claims utilization. Pay special attention to the Year-to-Date Surplus Column to see how your client’s claims are trending. This will give you an idea of whether they’re on track to receive a surplus check at the end of the plan year.

Buy Less Insurance, Get More Benefits!

High Deductible Health Plans (HDHP) don’t need to be qualified for HSAs in order to be effective for groups. In fact, some moderate up front copays covering basic services before the deductible applies is a great way to make a HDHP work better. Create an option that’s not HSA compatible to help some employees and employers maximize benefits AND SAVINGS! By purchasing a HDHP, your client can save a tremendous amount of premium compared to a more traditional style of health plan or HMO. The savings from purchasing an HDHP is often enough to offset or justify the higher deductible on the health plan. This leaves your client in a win-win situation. While this buying strategy has always been available, premium increases have been highly unpredictable. And often this strategy is overlooked in exchange for shopping for the cheapest premium and accepting the inevitable.

Health Reimbursement Arrangements - Updated with Double-Stacked Savings!

In June of 2002, the IRS established a ruling and terminology for what are now known as Health Reimbursement Arrangements (HRAs). An HRA is an extension of a qualified medical reimbursement plan, in which the employer agrees to provide reimbursement for certain employee medical expenses. This process has always enjoyed a tax favored status as employer payments for reimbursement of IRS qualified medical expenses are deductible to the employer and not considered taxable income to the employee. The 2002 ruling added clarification that an employer promise of reimbursement that goes unused in a given year, can in fact, be carried forward for future years’ expenses without adverse tax consequences.

Third Party Payment Efficiency Without Standards?

Achieving efficiency in an ecosystem absent of standards presents an insurmountable task. When each provider charges what they will but charges each patient according to the rules of responsible party paying on behalf of each patient’s health plan or absence thereof, we find only chaos. This chaos costs us hundreds of billions of dollars each year in bloated administrative waste and continued financial abuse of the system. According to the JAMA, this number is estimated to reflect “…$760 billion to $935 billion, of the $3.6 trillion the US spends on health care annually” … “is potentially wasteful.”

Assuring Coverage When it is Needed Most

Health coverage is often taken for granted until it is needed the most. How a person feels about their plan is often determined at that very point. But waiting until that point, or sadly, after it, to understand how the plan works, is too often the case. This results in more work, stress and potentially, unintentional lack of coverage...

Consumer Driven Health Plans - Give Me A Break!

Since when does your consumer drive his health plan? Did you know that one study once revealed that the American consumer can guess the price of a Honda within $300, and yet are off by about 50% a four-day hospital stay? Did you also know that 17% of consumers know the cost of their medical treatment BEFORE receiving it?

Critical Strategies for Consumer Driven Health Plans to Succeed

Consumer Driven Health Plan (CDHP) concepts are built upon the premise of buying less insurance. By using higher deductibles and cost-sharing (such as co-pays and co-insurance) one reduces the insurance costs enough to have money allotted to cover these increased cost sharing items.

Two Is Better Than One

A meeting or presentation with a prospective new client can be daunting. Each of us has our own methods of approaching. Over the past 30 plus years, I’ve accompanied many brokers and have seen a wide variety of successful formulas. But one thing rings true to all, and that is, the power of two...

Provide Rewards, Receive Rewards

Self-funded health benefit plans offer groups the opportunity to be rated more precisely for their own specific demographic situation that can all add up to great savings for some groups. While not everyone will save, many of your clients may be able to save significant costs on their benefits, compared to the fully insured market place.
What are you waiting for?
With BIC, your group can get better rates & money back on health benefits.
Get Started Now!
443-264-4588